A focused, 60-minute working session with you and your team to determine whether Delphi is the right method for your decision—and if so, how to design it for speed, credibility, and stakeholder buy-in. You’ll leave with a crisp decision statement, a recommended Delphi format (classic, modified, or real time), and a concrete plan for your next study.
The decision + success criteria (10–15 min)
What decision you’re trying to make (and what’s out of scope)
What “good” looks like: alignment, forecast accuracy, prioritization, standards, risk reduction
Time constraints and who must accept the result
Fit check: is Delphi the right tool? (10–15 min)
When Delphi works best vs. workshops, surveys, expert interviews etc.
What level of anonymity/independence you need
Risks (panel bias, low response rates, politicization) and how to mitigate them
Study architecture (20–25 min)
Panel design: who counts as an “expert,” how many, and how to balance viewpoints
Round plan: number of rounds, question types, consensus thresholds, feedback format
Data plan: what you’ll measure (central tendency, spread, stability shift, minority views)
Timeline and roles (what you do vs. what we do)
Decision pathway + next steps (5–10 min)
Recommended package/tier (or a custom hybrid)
Resourcing estimate: panel size, rounds, and expected lift
Immediate next actions for the next 72 hour
A 1-page Delphi Fit + Plan summary:
decision statement + scope boundary
recommended Delphi format + rounds
suggested panel profile + target size
draft timeline + key risks/mitigations
recommended next step (QuickStart / Oracle / Enterprise)
A focused, 60-minute working session with you and your team to determine whether Delphi is the right method for your decision—and if so, how to design it for speed, credibility, and stakeholder buy-in. You’ll leave with a crisp decision statement, a recommended Delphi format (classic, modified, or real time), and a concrete plan for your next study.
The decision + success criteria (10–15 min)
What decision you’re trying to make (and what’s out of scope)
What “good” looks like: alignment, forecast accuracy, prioritization, standards, risk reduction
Time constraints and who must accept the result
Fit check: is Delphi the right tool? (10–15 min)
When Delphi works best vs. workshops, surveys, expert interviews etc.
What level of anonymity/independence you need
Risks (panel bias, low response rates, politicization) and how to mitigate them
Study architecture (20–25 min)
Panel design: who counts as an “expert,” how many, and how to balance viewpoints
Round plan: number of rounds, question types, consensus thresholds, feedback format
Data plan: what you’ll measure (central tendency, spread, stability shift, minority views)
Timeline and roles (what you do vs. what we do)
Decision pathway + next steps (5–10 min)
Recommended package/tier (or a custom hybrid)
Resourcing estimate: panel size, rounds, and expected lift
Immediate next actions for the next 72 hour
A 1-page Delphi Fit + Plan summary:
decision statement + scope boundary
recommended Delphi format + rounds
suggested panel profile + target size
draft timeline + key risks/mitigations
recommended next step (QuickStart / Oracle / Enterprise)